Professor Kishor Wasan pointed out that there are five stages of leadership. There is a gradual increase in your ability to lead as the levels go. As you progress through the stages, you'll find that some are more difficult to complete than others. The following advice will help you get through them faster. The five degrees of leadership will be discussed in this article. You'll be ready to take on the next leadership challenge in your organization after reading this article.
Production is the name given to the initial stage. Your interpersonal skills must be at a high level at this point. This degree of leadership is more demanding and needs quick reactions to issues. These challenges come with huge rewards, though. As your team expands, you'll have a greater sense of accomplishment. At this level, you must be a change agent in order to succeed as a leader. An organization's focus shifts from the long-term vision to the current condition at this level.
Executive is the next position down the ladder. With its drawbacks, this level is best suited for the top management of a business. A great deal of authority and responsibility is not uncommon when it comes to executive positions. Leaders must be able to manage and direct their employees as individuals. As a result, this type of leadership is also more likely to lead to greater success in the long run. You must be willing to take risks and move out of your comfort zone in order to create solid relationships with your subordinates at this level of leadership.
The fifth level, according to Professor Kishor Wasan, is more practical and deals with a variety of ideas, such as humility and motivation. "First Who, Then What" and "Flywheel" are two examples. In order to discover the ideal individuals and test them in various roles before making a final decision, the book First Who, Then What offers guidance. Last but not least, Flywheel explains the concept of compounding effect, in which tiny activities come together to provide a solid foundation for the organization.
Finally, The 5 Levels of Leadership provides a useful framework for improving your leadership abilities. In the end, it's not about the name or the title - it's the process itself. The way you treat others is more important than your personal characteristics when it comes to being a leader. This book provides a four-step method for assessing your level. The first step is for your employees to anonymously rate your leadership abilities. Then you can begin to implement the essential leadership style modifications.
Leaders with a lot of latitude are more likely to be exploited than those with more authority. They misinterpret their leaders' benevolence as a sign of insecurity. Being so close to them gives them the false impression that they have unrestricted freedom. As a result, executives must spend less time pursuing their own interests and more time enhancing the well-being of the organization. Conflicts between leaders and their subordinates are less likely to occur when they prioritize the needs of their employees. Those who don't believe in you will not follow you. However, while there is no need to choose between the five tiers of leadership, each one comes with a price that must be paid.
Another alternative for leadership is compromise-based. It may appear to be a good middle ground, but it falls short in practice. It doesn't drive for success or match the demands of the team.. It's a good management approach to use when you'd rather not micromanage your staff and instead need to concentrate on more pressing matters. There should be no such thing as this kind of leadership in any organization. Consider the above-mentioned ideas if you want to keep your team motivated.
Sports teams have transactional-transactional leaders as their leaders. The performance of a team's leader is critical in sports. They risk significant injury if they don't meet their goals. Transparent feedback is a common method used by transactional executives to reward their employees for good work. There are pros and downsides to each of these leaders. For the most part, this is what we hear. The rules will be more likely to be followed if the leader is transactional.
That's when you're more inclined to be a dictator, Professor Kishor Wasan stressed that of management. It's not uncommon for this type of leader to dictate what the team should be doing and expect their subordinates to follow through. The most hardest type to deal with is the second. You should ultimately focus on your leadership style in light of the circumstances. So, pay attention to a leader's capacity to persuade other people. They should be able to sway other people in some way.
Comments